Skip to content

use ConfigKeys for account, domain, project and SSO settings - #14468

Open
DaanHoogland wants to merge 1 commit into
ghi10752-config-foundationfrom
ghi10752-config-account
Open

DaanHoogland wants to merge 1 commit into
ghi10752-config-foundationfrom
ghi10752-config-account

Conversation

@DaanHoogland

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Switches the account, domain, project and SSO call sites from Config/ConfigurationDao.getValue() to the ConfigKeys declared in the foundation PR.

Split out of #13884 (phase out the deprecated Config enum, #10752). Depends on #14467. Independent of the other PRs that depend on #14467, so it can be reviewed and merged in any order relative to them; GitHub retargets it to main once #14467 is merged.

Types of changes

  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
  • Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
  • Build/CI
  • Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

  • Major
  • Minor

Bug Severity

  • BLOCKER
  • Critical
  • Major
  • Minor
  • Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

Local verification: full reactor build (checkstyle included) and the unit tests of every touched module pass on this branch; merging all PRs of the split in any order gives no conflicts and reproduces #13884 plus its fixes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 1.78571% with 55 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 20.80%. Comparing base (a7194f9) to head (305e341).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../cloud/resourcelimit/ResourceLimitManagerImpl.java 0.00% 43 Missing ⚠️
...java/com/cloud/server/ConfigurationServerImpl.java 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
...in/java/com/cloud/projects/ProjectManagerImpl.java 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@                      Coverage Diff                      @@
##             ghi10752-config-foundation   #14468   +/-   ##
=============================================================
  Coverage                         20.80%   20.80%           
  Complexity                        20846    20846           
=============================================================
  Files                              6069     6069           
  Lines                            548527   548533    +6     
  Branches                          73236    73236           
=============================================================
+ Hits                             114119   114124    +5     
- Misses                           421065   421067    +2     
+ Partials                          13343    13342    -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
uitests 3.86% <ø> (ø)
unittests 22.24% <1.78%> (+<0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Oct 22, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric Value
Line coverage 25.73%
Branch coverage 20.84%

Grade Scale

Grade Line Coverage Meaning
🟢 A ≥ 80% Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B 60-79% Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C 40-59% Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D 20-39% Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F < 20% Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run

@DaanHoogland DaanHoogland mentioned this pull request Oct 23, 2026
3 of 14 tasks
@DaanHoogland
DaanHoogland force-pushed the ghi10752-config-account branch from f3c9b51 to 58b3437 Compare October 27, 2026 11:36
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 27, 2026 11:36

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

@DaanHoogland
DaanHoogland force-pushed the ghi10752-config-account branch from 58b3437 to 7d102b0 Compare October 28, 2026 07:28
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings October 28, 2026 07:28

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

Part of the split of #13884 (phase out the Config enum, #10752).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <[email protected]>
@DaanHoogland
DaanHoogland force-pushed the ghi10752-config-account branch from 7d102b0 to 305e341 Compare November 13, 2026 16:14
Copilot AI balanced review requested due to automatic review settings November 13, 2026 16:14

Copilot AI left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot was unable to review this pull request because the user who requested the review has insufficient remaining quota.

@sonarqubecloud

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
1.5% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 40%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants