Repository navigation
docs: Befund-Ledger + bindendes Critic-Verdikt (Design) - #5
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Design-Doc, kein Code:
docs/2026-11-13-befund-ledger-critic-verdikt-design.md.Ersetzt die zählerbasierte Fortschrittsmessung der Rückkante durch einen Ledger mit Befund-Identität, holt das Critic-Verdikt in den getesteten Kern und macht es merge-bindend. Ausgelöst wurde das durch einen Vergleich mit dem Elephant-Goldfish Model (google/elephant-goldfish-model).
Lücken im Ist-Zustand, die das Doc belegt:
openedaktiviert, der Critic ist kein Check.resume.ts→merge-pending).Vorschlag: Impl-PR als Draft öffnen und erst nach einem abgeleiteten
acceptedauf „ready“ setzen. Dazu den Ledger mit Keys und Zuständen open/fixed-claimed/closed/reopened, Eskalation bei Oszillation sowienot-run≠ keine Befunde.Vor der Abnahme gab es eine frische Critic-Runde, ihre Befunde B1–B9 sind eingearbeitet. Ledger-Persistenz über
resumeund menschliche Review-Kommentare sind ausdrücklich ausgeklammert.