[anastygnome]

Depends on #350

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 99.15966% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 98.98%. Comparing base (b518712) to head (ad03c84).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
src/items/offset.rs	98.55%	1 Missing ⚠️
src/items/time.rs	96.15%	1 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #355      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   98.90%   98.98%   +0.08%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines        4546     4714     +168     
  Branches      142      144       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         4496     4666     +170     
+ Misses         49       47       -2     
  Partials        1        1              

Flag	Coverage Δ
macos_latest	?
ubuntu_latest	98.98% <99.15%> (+0.08%)	⬆️
windows_latest	12.09% <46.63%> (-0.10%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[codspeed]

Merging this PR will improve performance by 16.98%

1 warning

⚠️ 16 benchmarks are dominated by system calls

System calls cannot be simulated consistently and are left out of the measure. The reported value understates the real cost. Switch to the Walltime instrument to measure them.

Learn more about system calls

See affected benchmarks

⚡ 16 improved benchmarks
✅ 5 untouched benchmarks

Performance Changes

	Benchmark	BASE	HEAD	Efficiency
⚡	parse_relative_time	46.5 µs	36.5 µs	+27.6%
⚡	parse_extended_year_relative	55.4 µs	43.9 µs	+26.26%
⚡	parse_invalid_input	38.9 µs	30.8 µs	+26.11%
⚡	parse_datetime_with_delta	74.9 µs	62.2 µs	+20.49%
⚡	parse_weekday	40.5 µs	33.6 µs	+20.43%
⚡	parse_relative_time_complex	60.4 µs	50.7 µs	+19.08%
⚡	parse_datetime_ending_in_z	59.7 µs	51.1 µs	+16.89%
⚡	parse_extended_year_rollover	80.3 µs	69 µs	+16.4%
⚡	parse_now	29.8 µs	25.6 µs	+16.3%
⚡	parse_datetime_with_tz_name	61.7 µs	53.1 µs	+16.22%
⚡	parse_ctime_format	69.4 µs	59.8 µs	+15.95%
⚡	parse_timezone_offset	58.5 µs	50.7 µs	+15.39%
⚡	parse_yesterday	30.5 µs	27.5 µs	+10.86%
⚡	parse_iso_datetime	49.4 µs	45.2 µs	+9.24%
⚡	parse_tomorrow	30 µs	27.5 µs	+8.96%
⚡	parse_iso_datetime_t_separator	49.9 µs	46.3 µs	+7.93%

Tip

Curious why performance improved? Comment @codspeedbot explain why performance improved on this PR, or directly use the CodSpeed MCP with your agent.

---

_{Comparing anastygnome:perf/performance-improvements (ad03c84) with main (22d40aa)}

[sylvestre]

I really like you didn't touch tests :)

[anastygnome]

I did ?

[sylvestre]

https://github.com/uutils/parse_datetime/tree/main/tests these

[anastygnome]

https://github.com/uutils/parse_datetime/tree/main/tests these

well, I just rewrote the parser in place and rechecked every rule, want me to add some?