Repository navigation
Conversation
…neration Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
posthog-python Compliance ReportDate: 2026-11-09T18:36:37.729974+00:00 ✅ All Tests Passed!270/270 tests passed Capture_V1 Tests✅ 95/95 tests passed View Details
Capture_Ai Tests✅ 5/5 tests passed View Details
Feature_Flags Tests✅ 17/17 tests passed View Details
Feature_Flags_V4 Tests✅ 149/149 tests passed View Details
Feature_Flags_Local_Evaluation Tests✅ 4/4 tests passed View Details
|
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
3 of 13 tasks
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Nov 4, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Contributor
SDK performance: posthog-python1 change worth reviewing: 1 observed improvement. Flags require at least a 5% change in the median and all six pairs agreeing on direction. This is a noise filter, not proof of a performance change or a CI gate.
View all results
Values are medians of paired measurements. Not flagged does not mean unchanged. Unavailable means a measurement could not be provided, not zero. Estimated allocation measurements retain their instrumentation uncertainty. RSS measures the whole process, not just SDK allocations; observed peaks are sampled checkpoints. Paired ranges in the diagnostics describe variability, not confidence intervals. Each shard uses its own runner; compare Before PR against With PR within a row, not across shards. Compared 102 metric rows; 102 rows shown in all results. Omitted or shortened data remain in |
gewenyu99
marked this pull request as ready for review
November 5, 2026 16:10
dustinbyrne
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2026
dustinbyrne
left a comment
dustinbyrne
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reviewed the Markdown release wiring and removal of HogRef generation. No issues found in this diff; the documented rollout order still applies.
AI-assisted review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
turnipdabeets
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2026
The release's reference step is best-effort, so a failure never blocks a release. generate-references.yml reruns it from main on demand and commits references/ when anything changed. Same shape as posthog-js's generate-references.yml. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
![posthog[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/1203049?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
PostHog Review · Standard · reviewed c05acb5: 2 Should fix.
See this review and its findings in PostHog Review. Comment @posthog review --deep for a Deep review. A Deep review takes longer and looks deeper than a Standard review.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
…the sdk-specs checkout block a release Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The reference step is best-effort, so a failure leaves the release green. A ::warning:: annotation now says so and points to generate-references.yml. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
johncwaters
approved these changes
Nov 5, 2026
johncwaters
left a comment
johncwaters
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Note
Automated review by Glimmervoid, not written by a human. Approved by hand after checking it.
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
💡 Motivation and Context
We have a wave of breaking changes with new major versions for most SDKs. References are now read mostly by bots, not humans, and the HogRef format is heavy. Releases now regenerate the Markdown, and the HogRef generator is removed. Stacked on #1184.
The committed HogRef JSON files go after every SDK moves to Markdown.
💚 How did you test it?
bin/docs --sdk-specs <checkout>reproduces the docs: generate the 7.x Markdown reference #1183 pages. The release job itself didn't run..github/workflows/generate-references.ymlreruns it by hand frommainand commitsreferences/when anything changed. It follows the prior art in posthog-js'sgenerate-references.yml, and it's the same in every SDK repo apart from the generation step.📝 Checklist
If releasing new changes
sampo addto generate a changeset file🤖 Agent context
Autonomy: Human-driven (agent-assisted)
Claude Code (Opus 5.5), directed by Vincent.
Merge order
/docs/libraries/python/referenceis livedatafield) and the SDK repos (their JSON files)🤖 Generated with Claude Code